Attaining a sustainable level of economic growth which would further translate into economic development is the major aim of policy makers in various countries as it impacts positively on the citizenry and drives the economy even further to a better level of equilibrium than that which it currently finds itself in. Various studies have looked at the impact of macroeconomic determinants used in this study either individually or as a collection and the effect which such have on economic growth. This study therefore empirically examined the macroeconomic determinants of economic growth in Nigeria obtaining data for a thirty five year period between 1981 and 2015 for the various variables of interest used in the study which include Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Inflation rate, Interest rate, Exchange rate and Unemployment rate.
The results of the study was analyzed using various tests such as the descriptive statistics, stationarity tests using the Augmented Dickey Fuller test and Phillip Perron tests, the Bound cointegration test for establishing the long run relationship of the variables as well as the Pairwise granger causality test to establish the level of causality among the variables of interest Also, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model was used in analyzing the regression results while stability and diagnostic tests using were carried out to establish the appropriateness of the ARDL model for the study. Also, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation tests were carried out to ensure the absence of serial correlation among the variables used in the study.
The result findings revealed that inflation contributes positively to economic growth; interest rate and unemployment have a negative impact on economic growth while exchange rate only contributes positively to economic growth in the short run with a negative effect experienced in the long run. As for past GDP, the result shows that it contributes positively to current GDP.
The study concludes that past income as influenced by the macroeconomic variables contribute significantly to the current level of income in the Nigerian economy.
The study thus recommends among others that inflation targeting which would commensurate the level of economic growth should be pursued by policy makers. Also recommended was policies which would discourage the inflow of excessive foreign capital which makes exportables expensive and worsens the import dependency of the country. In addition, social policies that would encourage transfer of resources to the rural and poor areas were recommended.
Keywords: Macroeconomic determinants, Economic Growth (GDP), Inflation rate, Exchange
Word Count: 385
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Table of Contents vi
List of Tables x
List of Figures xi
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 3
1.3 Objective of the Study 5
1.4 Research Question 6
1.5 Hypotheses 6
1.6 Justification for the Study 6
1.7 Scope of the Study 7
1.8 Significance of the Study 7
1.9 Operationalization of Variables 8
1.10 Operational Definition of Terms 8
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Conceptual Review 10
2.1.1 Concept of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 10
2.1.2 Concept of Inflation 11
2.1.3 Concept of Exchange Rate 12
2.1.4 Concept of Interest Rate 13
2.1.5 Concept of Unemployment 14
2.1.6 Overview of Macroeconomic Indicators and Economic Growth 14
2.1.7 Conceptual Design 16
2.2 Theoretical Review 17
2.2.1 Theories of Economic Growth 17
220.127.116.11 Classical Growth Theory 17
18.104.22.168Harrod-Domar Growth Theory 17
22.214.171.124 Augmented Solow Growth Theory 18
126.96.36.199 Endogenous Growth Theory 18
2.2.2 Theories of Inflation 19
188.8.131.52 Monetary Theory of Inflation 19
184.108.40.206 Structural Inflation Theory 19
220.127.116.11 Rational Expectation Revolution 19
18.104.22.168 Phillips Curve 20
2.2.3 Theories of Unemployment 21
22.214.171.124 Keynesian Theory of Unemployment 21
126.96.36.199 Marxian Theory of Unemployment 22
188.8.131.52 New Keynesian Theory 22
184.108.40.206 Okun’s Law 23
2.2.4 Theories of Interest Rate 24
220.127.116.11 Loanable Funds Theory 24
18.104.22.168 Keynesian Theory 24
2.2.5 Theories of Exchange Rate 25
22.214.171.124 Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) 25
126.96.36.199 Keynesian Absorption Approach 25
2.2.6 Theoretical Linkage of the Theories to the Study 26
2.2.7 Theoretical Framework 30
188.8.131.52 Augmented Solow Growth Model 30
184.108.40.206 Endogenous Growth Model 30
2.3 Empirical Evidence 32
2.3.1 Developed Countries 32
2.3.2 Developing and Emerging Economies 35
2.3.3 Empirical Evidence In Nigeria 41
2.3.4 Gaps in Literature 44
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction 46
3.1 Research Design 46
3.2 Population 46
3.3 Sources of Data 46
3.4 Justification of the Variables 47
3.5 Model Specification 49
3.6 Method of Data Analysis 50
3.6.1 Pre Estimation Tests 50
220.127.116.11 Normality Test and Descriptive statistics 50
18.104.22.168 Stationarity Tests (ADF and PP) 51
22.214.171.124 Cointegration Test 51
126.96.36.199 Lag Length Determination 52
188.8.131.52 Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model 52
184.108.40.206 Causality Test 52
3.6.2 Post Estimation Tests 52
220.127.116.11 Autocorrelation Test 52
18.104.22.168 Heteroskedasticity Test 53
22.214.171.124 Multicollinearity Test 53
3.7 Apriori Expectation 53
3.8Ethical Consideration 53
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANAYSIS, RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
4.0 Introduction 54
4.1 Preliminary Analysis 54
4.1.1 Trend Analysis 54
4.1.2 Descriptive Statistics 56
4.2 Result of Empirical Analysis 57
4.2.1 Stationarity Tests (ADF and PP) 57
4.2.2 Test for Cointegration 60
4.2.3 Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model 61
4.2.4 Granger Causality Test 62
4.3 Post Estimation Tests 64
4.3.1 Stability and Diagnostic Tests 64
4.3.2 Autocorrelation and Heteroskedasticity Test 65
4.4 Discussion and Interpretation of Results 66
4.4.1 In comparison with a Priori Expectations 66
126.96.36.199 Summary of Findings 67
4.4.2 Descriptive Findings 67
4.4.3 Empirical Findings 67
4.4.4 Theoretical Findings 68
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary 73
5.2 Conclusion 75
5.3 Recommendations 75
5.4 Contribution to Knowledge 76
5.5 Suggestion for Further Research 77
LIST OF TABLES
4.1 Descriptive statistics 56
4.2 Tests for stationarity 57
4.3 Test for cointegration 60
4.4 ARDL Model 61
4.51 Causality table between GDP and Interest rate 62
4.52 Causality table between GDP and Inflation rate 62
4.53 Causality table between GDP and Exchange rate 63
4.54 Causality table between GDP and Unemployment rate 63
4.61 Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation Test 66
4.62 Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey Test 66
LIST OF FIGURES
4.1 Trend Analysis of Data 54
4.2 Detrending Impact of Macroeconomic Variables 59
4.2 Stability & Diagonistic test using Schwarz Criterion 64
1.1 Background to the Study
The relationship between economic growth and macroeconomic determinants has long been a popular issue of debate in the literature of economic development (Nihat, Ali & Emrah, 2013). The importance of economic growth in Africa cannot be underestimated with most countries experiencing low growth rates. Discussions have been made on the area of economic growth among policy makers and the focus has been on developing countries and Nigeria has not been exempted from such discussions. The debate on the key drivers of economic growth has been ongoing and it is still far from over. Godwin (2007) defines economic growth as an increase in real gross domestic product (RGDP). Research on economic growth had been undertaken in both theoretical and applied work. The main aim of macroeconomic policy is to have stable prices (low inflation), low levels of debt (whether foreign or domestic), free market economy, low levels of unemployment, having an economy based on a four sector model and based on an open economy (Mbulawa, 2015). There is therefore a need to evaluate those macroeconomic determinants of economic growth of a country with Nigeria being the country of focus in this study.
The GDP is one of the measures of national income and output for a given country’s economy at a given period of time. The definition of GDP is based on the total market value of all final goods and services produced within the country in a given period of time (normally one year). The evaluation process also involves the sum of value added at every stage of production (the intermediate stages) of all final commodities (goods and services) produced within a country in a given period of time monetarily (Kira, 2013). Gross Domestic Product represents the economic health of a country. GDP consists of consumer spending, investment expenditure, government spending and net exports; hence it portrays an all-inclusive picture of an economy (Nihat et al, 2013). It provides an insight to investors as it highlights the trend of the economy by comparing GDP levels as an index. GDP is not only used as an indicator for most governments and economic decision-makers for planning and policy formulation; but also it helps the investors to manage their portfolios by providing them with guidance about the state of the economy (Nihat et al, 2013).
A widely accepted view in macroeconomics is that low inflation is a necessary condition for fostering economic growth. Although the debate about the precise relationship between inflation and growth remains open, the question of the existence and nature of the link between inflation and economic growth has been the subject of considerable interest and debate (Munir & Mansur, 2009). Inflation is a rise in the prices of goods and services without a corresponding increase in the value of such goods and services. Inflation remains a pervasive and persistent world problem because no economy in the world has been spared by its phenomenon. It is for this reason that making the maintenance of price stability has been a fundamental objective of macroeconomic policy. The emphasis here is that achieving the goal of price stability helps in the promotion of sustainable growth and development as well as strengthening the purchasing power of the domestic currency (Umaru & Zubairu, 2012; Ojonye, 2015). Consequently, the need to understand the relationship between inflation and economic growth of the Nigerian economy has become imperative and understanding the dynamics of inflation has become central to the achievement of price stability.
Interest rates are crucial elements in the transmission of monetary policy actions to economic activities. The interest rate policy in Nigeria for example has changed within the time frame of regulated and deregulated regimes. However, the impacts of this variable on the economic growth of Nigeria have remained controversial (Acha & Acha, 2011). The Nigerian economy has at different times witnessed enormous interest rate swings in different sectors of the economy since the 1970s and mid 1980s under the regulated regime. The preferential interest rates were based on the premise that the market, if freely applied would exclude some priority sectors (Anyiyang, 2012). Prominent among the preferred sectors were the agricultural, manufacturing and solid mineral sectors which were accorded priority and deposit money banks were directed to charge preferential interest rates on all loans to encourage the upsurge of small-scale industrialization which is a catalyst for economic development (Udoka, 2000). However, rising interest rate over the last three years have started to hurt the Nigerian economy. Thus it is necessary to establish the link also between interest rate and economic growth in Nigeria.
Exchange rate management has been a topical issue among academics and policy makers for a very long time (Azeez & Kolapo, 2012). Exchange rate has been defined as the price of one currency in terms of another (Mordi, 2006). The increase or decrease of real exchange rate indicates strength and weakness of currency in relation to foreign currency and it is a standard for illustrating the competitiveness of domestic industries in the world market (Razazadehkarsalari, Haghiri & Behrooznia, 2011). In Nigeria and indeed any developing country, the price of foreign exchange plays a critical role in the ability of the economy to attain optimal levels in production activities (Rasaq, 2013). Rapid or persistent growth is likely to involve positive changes in the nature of economic activity which exchange rate fluctuation could encourage (Okorontah & Odoemena, 2016). However, negative fluctuations in the exchange rate of a country can hamper economic growth. It is therefore imperative to study the relationship between exchange rate and the economic growth in Nigeria.
It is a widely accepted view in economics that the growth rate measured by the GDP of an economy increases employment and reduces unemployment (Fuad, 2011). However, unemployment and slow growth continues to be two of the major challenges facing every country regardless of the state of their economic and social development (Madito & Khumalo, 2014). While the level of unemployment affects the rate of GDP-Growth, it also serves as an indicator of the country’s state of the economy as it indicate how well the economy utilizes its resources (Madito & Khumalo, 2014). Achieving a low level of unemployment rate is therefore one of the goals of many governments in the world which is also one of the policy goals of the Nigerian government, as it is believed that this can help attain a better level of growth in the country.
The focus of this research work therefore is to examine the extent to which macroeconomic factors affect the rate of economic growth in Nigeria. It should be noted that changes in macroeconomic conditions affect the performance of the economy as a whole and thus a nation’s financial health. It is therefore very important to ascertain the link between these macroeconomic conditions and economic growth.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Over the years, the Nigerian economy has experienced stable rate of economic growth, though results recently points to a declining state in the level of economic growth experienced in the past especially in the last year under review in this study which was year 2015. Studies in the past have shown the state of the economy depends on the relationship that exists among various macroeconomic variables and how well these variables interplay to push the economy to a better level of equilibrium than that which it currently is in. According to Obrimah (2015), economic interactions have resulted in a decrease in inflation levels in Nigeria from about 18% in 2005 to about 12% in 2012, this cannot be said however for the results of 2015 which experienced an increase in consumer price index of about 9% which was a 11.92% rise from the 8.1% recorded in 2014 and the 8.5% figure for 2013 (Trading Economics, 2016)
Also, interest rate in Nigeria which has the ability to impact on the level of investment and availability of credit in the country has averaged about 10.24% from 2010 to 2015 following a record low of 6% in July 2009 where the country experienced tremendous economic growth (Trading Economics, 2016). This increase in interest rates attracted the inflow of foreign capital into the economy which has been sustained in the economy for a long period of time as investors found the increase in the rates for borrowing funds unattractive, thus leading to them seeking for funds from external sources. The sustained dependence on foreign capital over a long period of time has been associated as one of the major causes of a decline in the value of the naira and also a cause of the increased level of inflation in Nigeria, a country which largely depends on imported goods and has had its exportables being unattractive to other countries. Despite the lack of synergy among the level of inflation, the cost of borrowing funds represented by interest rate and the value of the local currency which is the naira, Nigeria’s unemployment rate stood at 9.0% in 2015 which represents a 34.44% change from the 7.8% which was recorded in 2014 (Trading Economics, 2016).
The increase in the level of unemployment has been associated to loss of jobs as various companies in different industries have been involved in massive retrenchments due to the uncertainty of the economic environment in the country. The effect of the variations in unemployment rate, interest rate, exchange rate and inflation rate has definitely had an impact on the environmental conditions of the household, firms and government. The result of the increase in the dependence on foreign capital coupled with the fact that Nigeria depends majorly on imports impacted on the ability of the household to buy goods and services as prices for commodities were high which thus reduced the purchasing power of the household. This also affected the level of savings of the domestic household, as increasing interest rates and its associated features discouraged consumption and thus impacted on the level of earnings of the firms as profit dropped which led to a mass retrenchments of workers in 2015. Bringing all the above fact together, it is obvious that the Nigerian economy has been performing without synergy between the macroeconomic objectives as well as the monetary and fiscal policy.
Efforts by the monetary authority, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to curtail inflation by increasing interest rate shrinks the ability of the financial sector to create more money through loans and which thus contributed negatively to growth. In the same vein, the increasing level of interest rate has failed to suppress the level of inflation, as the Nigerian economy is largely import dependent. Efforts by the monetary authority to improve the value of Naira through increased interest rate has failed to attract foreign investment into the Nigerian economy, with the domestic economy suffering from the scarcity of capital and consequently close down of industries which affected the employment rate within the economy negatively and which has also led to the consistent decline in the growth of the economy in 2015. Having this in mind, it can be said that the level of growth experienced by the Nigerian economy over the study period has been non-inclusive, as the ability of Nigerians to defend their standard of living through prior savings was insufficient. All these problems obviously need to be attended to as they all have their chain-reaction and contribution to the current level of income which obviously has its implication for economic growth of Nigeria.
1.3 Objective of the study
The specific objectives of the study are to:
- evaluate the relative importance of prior income (past GDP) on current national income (current GDP) and
- ascertain the relative significance of macroeconomic factors (inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate and unemployment rate) on current national income (current GDP).
1.4 Research Questions
The research questions which the study seeks to address are:
- Does prior income have a greater impact on current income (current GDP)?
- Do the macroeconomic factors (inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate and unemployment rate) have a greater impact on current income (current GDP)?
In the course of the research work, the hypotheses were tested at 0.05 and 0.10 level of significance
H01: Prior income (past GDP) does not have a significant impact on current income (current GDP).
H02: The macroeconomic factors (inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate and unemployment rate) do not have a significant impact on current income (current GDP).
1.6 Justification for the Study
The macroeconomic environment of the Nigerian economy has experienced different mix of policies, from the colonial era to independence, the adoption of SAP and the emergence of the democratic government. The adoption of SAP led to significant shift in policy orientation, as the economy was exposed to varying exchange rate and deregulation of sectors of the Nigerian economy which subsequently paved the way for the democratic government. The high level of growth attained which are largely through crude oil exportation have not been fully utilised to develop the economy and thus reliance falls on the macroeconomic determinants of growth to bail out the economy. The efficiency of the macroeconomic determinants has shown varying trends over the study period. The most revealing of all is the level of non-inclusiveness of growth experienced by the Nigerian economy which is largely due to the monotonic nature of the economy by over dependence on crude oil and the abandonment of the agricultural sector. The level of income available to Nigerians has been eroded with rising inflation and over-dependence on imported consumables which further degraded the level of income generation of Nigeria, as jobs are being transferred from the importing countries (Nigeria) to exporting countries. Putting all these into perspective, there is the need to properly analyse the role of the macroeconomic determinants in growing past and current income, and specifically how their effect on past income robs-off on current income. This thus forms the rationale for this research work.
1.7 Scope of the Study
The study focuses on the effect of macroeconomic determinants on economic growth in Nigeria. For the purpose of this study, the years considered span a period of thirty-five years from 1981 to 2015. Data was sourced from CBN statistical bulletin and the World Bank data. Lack of sufficient published materials such as books and journals in the library relevant to the research topic. This forced the researcher to rely on e-books which are time consuming in terms of ease of access. Also, time constraint might be another major limitation to the study given that the researcher is restricted to carry out the study within a short period of time.The study focuses on those macroeconomic variables such as exchange rate, interest rate, inflation rate, unemployment rate and economic growth. These variables form the area of interest of this research work although we have other macroeconomic variables that affect economic growth in Nigeria.
1.8 Significance of the Study
The focus of the study is the Nigerian economy considering various macroeconomic determinants and their effect on economic growth in Nigeria. In order to achieve the macroeconomic goals of attaining rapid growth of the economy and the alleviation of poverty, unemployment and inequality, government authorities and its agencies come up with various policies aimed at ensuring a sound economic system which can translate into economic growth. This study would therefore be beneficial in providing appropriate suggestions to the government authorities as well as its agencies as to those macroeconomic variables that affect economic growth in Nigeria.
As at 2010, about 61% of Nigeria’s population of about 160 million live below poverty line of United State Dollar (US$) 1.25 a day (National Bureau of Statistics, 2013).This study aimed at studying those macroeconomic variables that would help in achieving a sustainable level of economic growth which would in turn transform the lives of a majority of the Nigerian populace and improve living conditions in the country. This research also serves as a guide to finance experts, economists and policy makers in formulating appropriate policies and providing advice that will serve the interest of the country at large. This study would also be of immense benefit to researchers who would be interested in undertaking similar researches in the area of interest in future and can therefore form a reference point for them in carrying out their inquiries as economic growth has become a very interesting issue in Nigeria currently in the face of the current economic recession the country is facing. This makes it necessary for studies relating to the area of economic growth to be carried out to get the Nigerian economy out of the current problems which it faces.
1.9 Operationalization of Variables
Yit = 0 + 1X1it + 2X2it + 3X3it + 4X4it + 5 X5it + it 1.1
Economic growth (RGDP) = f(macroeconomic variables)
Y = Economic Growth (RGDP) (Dependent Variable)
X = Macroeconomic determinants (Independent Variables)
X1 = Past RGDP
X2 = Inflation (Consumer price index)
X3 = Interest rate
X4 = Exchange rate
X5 = Unemployment rate
0= Intercept, 1-5= Coefficient of the independent variables
1.10 Operational Definition of Terms
Exchange rate: This is the rate at which a unit of currency is exchanged for other currencies. It is the price of one country’s currency in terms of another. It is also regarded as the value of one country’s currency in relation to another currency.
Inflation: This is the continued increase in the general price level of goods and services without a corresponding increase in the value of such goods and services. It is the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services is rising and consequently, the purchasing power of naira is falling.
Interest rate: This is the amount charged, expressed as a percentage of the principal by a lender to a borrower for the use of assets. It is the amount of interest due per period as a proportion of the amount lent, deposited or borrowed (called the principal sum).
Gross Domestic Product: This is the monetary measure of the market value of all final goods and services produced in a country in a given period usually a year. It is the aggregate measure of production equal to the sum of the gross value added of all residents and institutional units engaged in production (plus any taxes and minus any subsidies on products not included in the value of their outputs).
Unemployment: This is the phenomenon that occurs when a person who is actively searching for work is unable to find work. It occurs when people who are without work are actively seeking paid work.
Economic growth: This is an increase in the output that an economy produces over a period of time. It is the increase in the inflation adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy over time
DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, iProjectMaterials.com are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. iProjectMaterials.com is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. The paid subscription on iProjectMaterials.com is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.